Struggling to spark deeper discussions around chess articles in your community? These article conversation templates make it easy to prompt thoughtful exchanges, so your members can share insights, opinions, and expertise with one another.
Plan your content calendar and auto-post to Skool, Circle, or Mighty Networks
Article conversation posts tap into members' natural curiosity and desire to process new ideas. By summarizing key points and prompting reflection, you lower the barrier for participation, inviting both casual readers and chess enthusiasts to weigh in. Highlighting controversial or innovative perspectives encourages debate, making the conversation more dynamic and inclusive.
This approach also helps community members feel heard and valued, since they are asked not just for answers, but for their opinions and takes. It builds a culture where sharing, learning, and respectful disagreement are all welcomed, deepening member loyalty and time spent engaging.
Just read this article on Magnus Carlsen's endgame strategies. What surprised you most?
💡 Example: "Just read this article on Magnus Carlsen's endgame strategies. What surprised you most?"
The author claims blitz chess improves calculation speed. Do you agree or disagree?
💡 Example: "The author claims blitz chess improves calculation speed. Do you agree or disagree?"
Which opening mentioned in today's article do you find most effective and why?
💡 Example: "Which opening mentioned in today's article do you find most effective and why?"
Share your take: Is classical chess becoming less popular as the article suggests?
💡 Example: "Share your take: Is classical chess becoming less popular as the article suggests?"
The article highlights three famous blunders. Which one would you never forget?
💡 Example: "The article highlights three famous blunders. Which one would you never forget?"
Do you think AI analysis is making chess more accessible, as this editorial claims?
💡 Example: "Do you think AI analysis is making chess more accessible, as this editorial claims?"
What is your biggest takeaway from the featured interview with Hikaru Nakamura?
💡 Example: "What is your biggest takeaway from the featured interview with Hikaru Nakamura?"
The article suggests rapid games are more viewer-friendly. Agree or not?
💡 Example: "The article suggests rapid games are more viewer-friendly. Agree or not?"
Did you learn any new tactics from today's article? Share one if you did.
💡 Example: "Did you learn any new tactics from today's article? Share one if you did."
Which chess myth mentioned in the article did you find most surprising?
💡 Example: "Which chess myth mentioned in the article did you find most surprising?"
If you could ask the article's author one question, what would it be?
💡 Example: "If you could ask the article's author one question, what would it be?"
How do you feel about the article's view on chess and mental health?
💡 Example: "How do you feel about the article's view on chess and mental health?"
The article compares OTB and online chess. Which do you prefer and why?
💡 Example: "The article compares OTB and online chess. Which do you prefer and why?"
Do you agree with the top lesson from today's article? Why or why not?
💡 Example: "Do you agree with the top lesson from today's article? Why or why not?"
What would you add to the list of chess resources mentioned in the article?
💡 Example: "What would you add to the list of chess resources mentioned in the article?"
Share your reaction to the final position shown in the article.
💡 Example: "Share your reaction to the final position shown in the article."
The article says chess teaches patience. Do you agree? How has it helped you?
💡 Example: "The article says chess teaches patience. Do you agree? How has it helped you?"
Which historical match from the article would you like to watch live?
💡 Example: "Which historical match from the article would you like to watch live?"
The editorial claims tactics are more important than openings. What's your view?
💡 Example: "The editorial claims tactics are more important than openings. What's your view?"
What did you find most controversial in today's chess article?
💡 Example: "What did you find most controversial in today's chess article?"
Did the article change your perspective on chess preparation?
💡 Example: "Did the article change your perspective on chess preparation?"
Which quote from the article stood out to you? Share it below.
💡 Example: "Which quote from the article stood out to you? Share it below."
The article suggests daily puzzles improve play. Have you tried this?
💡 Example: "The article suggests daily puzzles improve play. Have you tried this?"
If you disagree with the article, what would you argue instead?
💡 Example: "If you disagree with the article, what would you argue instead?"
What other examples support or refute the article's main claim?
💡 Example: "What other examples support or refute the article's main claim?"
How would you apply the article's advice in your own games?
💡 Example: "How would you apply the article's advice in your own games?"
Do you think the article overstates the importance of studying theory?
💡 Example: "Do you think the article overstates the importance of studying theory?"
Have you experienced the same challenges discussed in the article?
💡 Example: "Have you experienced the same challenges discussed in the article?"
Which player profile in the article inspired you most?
💡 Example: "Which player profile in the article inspired you most?"
The article lists common mistakes. Which one do you relate to?
💡 Example: "The article lists common mistakes. Which one do you relate to?"
How might the ideas in the article change chess training in the future?
💡 Example: "How might the ideas in the article change chess training in the future?"
What did you find unclear or missing from the article?
💡 Example: "What did you find unclear or missing from the article?"
The author suggests a new approach to learning openings. Would you try it?
💡 Example: "The author suggests a new approach to learning openings. Would you try it?"
Share a real-life example that supports the article's advice.
💡 Example: "Share a real-life example that supports the article's advice."
Do you follow any of the routines mentioned in the article? How have they helped?
💡 Example: "Do you follow any of the routines mentioned in the article? How have they helped?"
What chess book or video would you recommend to build on this article's ideas?
💡 Example: "What chess book or video would you recommend to build on this article's ideas?"
Did the article inspire you to try a new chess tool or app?
💡 Example: "Did the article inspire you to try a new chess tool or app?"
If you had to sum up the article's message in one sentence, what would it be?
💡 Example: "If you had to sum up the article's message in one sentence, what would it be?"
What would you like to see covered in future chess articles?
💡 Example: "What would you like to see covered in future chess articles?"
Any disagreements with the way the article presented the latest chess controversy?
💡 Example: "Any disagreements with the way the article presented the latest chess controversy?"
How would beginners benefit from the article's insights?
💡 Example: "How would beginners benefit from the article's insights?"
To use these templates, simply copy and paste your chosen prompt into your community platform. Begin your post with a brief summary or quote from the article, then add the template question or prompt. Tag or mention relevant members to increase visibility, and respond to initial replies to keep the conversation active. Adjust the tone or complexity depending on your audience's expertise.
These templates are designed for all platforms. Adjust post length and formatting for forums, social media, or chat apps. Use images or article previews where available to boost visibility. Pin or feature the best conversations to showcase quality engagement.
You can adapt templates to prompt members to share their experiences, strategies, or favorite games in each time format. For example, post an article summary comparing time controls and ask members to comment on which format best develops specific skills like calculation or intuition. This not only encourages nuanced discussion but also helps players at various levels reflect on their preferred game pace.
Select templates that encourage opinion sharing or analysis, then feature a recent article or video analyzing the London System at GM level. Ask members whether they agree with the expert’s critique and how their experiences align, or invite them to share their own recommended lines. This approach drives engagement by leveraging ongoing debates in the chess world.
Absolutely. Use a template that invites members to discuss a highlighted game or key position from a recent tournament. Encourage them to post their own annotations, alternative tactical ideas, or positional insights inspired by the article. This fosters deeper learning and connects your community around current chess events.
Choose templates that ask open-ended questions or bring in expert commentary, and specifically mention different levels of experience. For example, prompt titled players to share advanced endgame resources while encouraging casual members to relate their recent endgame blunders or breakthroughs. This creates a multi-layered discussion accessible to all skill levels.
Feature articles or guides focused on overcoming specific rating barriers, then use templates that ask members to reflect on their own struggles and strategies. Encourage sharing of personal stories, recommended study routines, or favorite learning tools. This builds a supportive environment for discussing rating-specific challenges unique to chess.
Post an article summarizing the latest FIDE rule changes, then use a conversation template that asks members to comment on their recent experiences or how the new rules have affected their preparation and games. Encourage debate about the pros and cons, and invite both online and over-the-board players to share perspectives, ensuring the conversation stays relevant and chess-specific.
Skool · Circle · Mighty Networks