Lawyer communities can get stuck in routine discussions. Hypothetical scenarios break the ice and spark creative thinking about AI's role in law. Use these ready-made prompts to drive participation and fresh ideas in your AI for Lawyers group.
Plan your content calendar and auto-post to Skool, Circle, or Mighty Networks
Hypothetical scenarios invite members to step outside their daily routines and consider novel situations. This kind of engagement taps into curiosity, encourages lateral thinking, and allows for diverse viewpoints. By removing the pressure of 'right answers,' members feel more comfortable sharing imaginative or speculative responses.
In legal and AI circles, discussing 'what if' scenarios helps professionals anticipate future challenges and opportunities. It builds group cohesion as members riff on each other's ideas, leading to deeper conversations about ethics, risk, innovation, and the evolving landscape of law. By blending playful thinking with relevant industry themes, these posts keep your community fresh and dynamic.
If an AI tool could write perfect legal briefs, how would your job change?
💡 Example: "If an AI tool could write perfect legal briefs, how would your job change? Share your thoughts!"
Imagine a judge uses AI to help make decisions. What safeguards would you want in place?
💡 Example: "Imagine a judge uses AI to help make decisions. What safeguards would you want in place?"
Suppose your opposing counsel uses an AI chatbot for legal research. Would you trust their findings?
💡 Example: "Suppose your opposing counsel uses an AI chatbot for legal research. Would you trust their findings?"
What if AI could predict case outcomes with 90 percent accuracy?
💡 Example: "What if AI could predict case outcomes with 90 percent accuracy?"
If client data privacy was fully handled by AI, how would you explain this to your clients?
💡 Example: "If client data privacy was fully handled by AI, how would you explain this to your clients?"
Picture a world where legal advice is dispensed by AI 24-7. What happens to pro bono work?
💡 Example: "Picture a world where legal advice is dispensed by AI 24-7. What happens to pro bono work?"
If you had an AI assistant who never made mistakes, would you still double-check its work?
💡 Example: "If you had an AI assistant who never made mistakes, would you still double-check its work?"
Imagine a client insists on using only AI-generated contracts. What would you advise?
💡 Example: "Imagine a client insists on using only AI-generated contracts. What would you advise?"
What would you do if AI flagged a minor error in your winning case strategy?
💡 Example: "What would you do if AI flagged a minor error in your winning case strategy?"
Suppose an AI tool misinterprets a legal precedent. Who is responsible?
💡 Example: "Suppose an AI tool misinterprets a legal precedent. Who is responsible?"
If AI could score your negotiation skills, would you want to see your score?
💡 Example: "If AI could score your negotiation skills, would you want to see your score?"
Imagine AI automates all discovery. How would you spend the time saved?
💡 Example: "Imagine AI automates all discovery. How would you spend the time saved?"
What if AI could instantly translate legal documents into any language?
💡 Example: "What if AI could instantly translate legal documents into any language?"
Suppose your favorite legal research platform is replaced by AI. What feature would you miss most?
💡 Example: "Suppose your favorite legal research platform is replaced by AI. What feature would you miss most?"
If AI analyzed your last 100 cases, what trend do you think it would find?
💡 Example: "If AI analyzed your last 100 cases, what trend do you think it would find?"
Imagine a new law requires all law firms to use AI for compliance. How would you prepare?
💡 Example: "Imagine a new law requires all law firms to use AI for compliance. How would you prepare?"
Suppose AI could detect bias in your writing. Would you want to use it?
💡 Example: "Suppose AI could detect bias in your writing. Would you want to use it?"
If AI handled all client intake, what would you do differently during onboarding?
💡 Example: "If AI handled all client intake, what would you do differently during onboarding?"
What if AI could instantly summarize every court filing you receive?
💡 Example: "What if AI could instantly summarize every court filing you receive?"
Imagine AI recommends settling a case you want to fight. What would you do?
💡 Example: "Imagine AI recommends settling a case you want to fight. What would you do?"
If AI tracked your billable hours, would you feel more or less pressure?
💡 Example: "If AI tracked your billable hours, would you feel more or less pressure?"
Suppose an AI system makes a better closing argument than you. How would you respond?
💡 Example: "Suppose an AI system makes a better closing argument than you. How would you respond?"
Imagine AI can detect when a witness is lying. Should this be allowed in court?
💡 Example: "Imagine AI can detect when a witness is lying. Should this be allowed in court?"
If your client trusts AI more than you, how would you earn their confidence back?
💡 Example: "If your client trusts AI more than you, how would you earn their confidence back?"
Suppose AI could spot loopholes in contracts instantly. How would this change negotiations?
💡 Example: "Suppose AI could spot loopholes in contracts instantly. How would this change negotiations?"
What if an AI tool was required for all court submissions?
💡 Example: "What if an AI tool was required for all court submissions?"
If AI could identify high-risk cases in your workload, would you use it to prioritize?
💡 Example: "If AI could identify high-risk cases in your workload, would you use it to prioritize?"
Imagine a world where AI writes all legal opinions. What role is left for lawyers?
💡 Example: "Imagine a world where AI writes all legal opinions. What role is left for lawyers?"
Suppose AI makes a wrong call that costs your client money. How would you handle it?
💡 Example: "Suppose AI makes a wrong call that costs your client money. How would you handle it?"
What if AI could automatically detect plagiarism in legal briefs?
💡 Example: "What if AI could automatically detect plagiarism in legal briefs?"
If every court had an AI clerk, what new skills would lawyers need?
💡 Example: "If every court had an AI clerk, what new skills would lawyers need?"
Suppose AI can rate the persuasiveness of your arguments. Would you want to know your score?
💡 Example: "Suppose AI can rate the persuasiveness of your arguments. Would you want to know your score?"
Imagine AI can recommend legal strategies based on your past wins. Would you use it?
💡 Example: "Imagine AI can recommend legal strategies based on your past wins. Would you use it?"
If AI was available for free to all, how would this affect solo practitioners?
💡 Example: "If AI was available for free to all, how would this affect solo practitioners?"
Suppose AI could draft client emails in your tone. Would you let it?
💡 Example: "Suppose AI could draft client emails in your tone. Would you let it?"
What if AI could predict which arguments a judge will favor?
💡 Example: "What if AI could predict which arguments a judge will favor?"
Imagine you could train an AI in your personal legal style. What would you teach it first?
💡 Example: "Imagine you could train an AI in your personal legal style. What would you teach it first?"
Suppose AI is trusted with sensitive evidence. How would you verify its security?
💡 Example: "Suppose AI is trusted with sensitive evidence. How would you verify its security?"
If clients could review your AI assistant online, how would you manage its reputation?
💡 Example: "If clients could review your AI assistant online, how would you manage its reputation?"
Imagine AI can instantly spot regulatory changes. How would you integrate this into your practice?
💡 Example: "Imagine AI can instantly spot regulatory changes. How would you integrate this into your practice?"
Pick a scenario template that matches your community's mood or current discussions. Post it as a new thread or conversation starter. Encourage members to reply with their thoughts, solutions, or creative takes. Consider tagging relevant members or pinning especially lively threads. Rotate between lighthearted and serious scenarios to maintain interest and balance.
These templates are designed for all platforms. Wherever your AI for Lawyers community lives, use them as discussion starters, poll prompts, or group chat icebreakers. Adapt tone and format slightly to fit your platform's norms, such as hashtags for LinkedIn or threaded replies in Slack.
Focus on real-world legal workflows where AI is being considered, such as contract review automation, legal research, or e-discovery. Present scenarios where lawyers must weigh ethical considerations, data privacy issues, or bias in algorithmic decision-making. This encourages nuanced discussions specific to legal tech implementation.
Frame scenarios around issues like unauthorized practice of law by AI systems, confidentiality breaches via AI tools, or accountability for algorithmic errors in court submissions. Include clear context and possible consequences to stimulate debate on professional responsibility within the AI for Lawyers community.
Yes, referencing jurisdiction-specific AI guidelines—such as differing rules on data retention, client consent for AI usage, or admissibility of AI-generated evidence—makes scenarios more relevant and fosters knowledge sharing among lawyers practicing in various legal systems.
Design scenarios where AI tools produce potentially biased outcomes in predictive policing, sentencing recommendations, or civil case triage. Ask members to consider how lawyers should identify, mitigate, or disclose such biases to clients and courts, encouraging critical thinking about AI's impact on legal equity.
Incorporate terms like NLP (natural language processing), supervised learning, or confidence thresholds. Describe situations where AI flags contractual clauses for risk but misses nuanced legal language, and challenge community members to discuss how lawyers should validate AI output before client delivery.
Pose situations where lawyers use AI chatbots for client intake or communication, and ask whether privilege is preserved or at risk based on the tool's data handling, storage, and third-party access. This drives valuable discussions on compliance and risk management unique to AI in legal settings.
Skool · Circle · Mighty Networks